Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

JPZdancewicz Bluefire Pro Poker Trainee
187 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

19 Apr 2012 at 1:19am

Discussion for Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max.
vitinhodzi Poker Newbie
26 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Re: Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

19 Apr 2012 at 2:27am

:S
mpowah Poker Newbie
15 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Re: Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

19 Apr 2012 at 9:14am

In the KTs hand do you really think he has a lot of bluffs in his range when he bets 1/2 pot on the river? You hand looks like Ax for sure and I think that his range with that river sizing is heavily skewed towards value and not bluffs(in fact betting like that he may not have any bluffs at all as all draws missed and you'd snap his 1/2 pot with any Ax).
JPZdancewicz Bluefire Pro Poker Trainee
187 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Re: Re: Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

20 Apr 2012 at 12:17am

mpowah wrote:

In the KTs hand do you really think he has a lot of bluffs in his range when he bets 1/2 pot on the river? You hand looks like Ax for sure and I think that his range with that river sizing is heavily skewed towards value and not bluffs(in fact betting like that he may not have any bluffs at all as all draws missed and you'd snap his 1/2 pot with any Ax).

A large consideration for even floating the turn was that we were fairly deep for someone to expect to c/r Ax and get 3 streets of value. I would also like to think that my perceived range is a bit wider than Ax and includes as many(probably more) draws as his range, as well as weak Ax and Qx.

As for sizing, maybe I'm projecting my own style/thoughts onto this villain but, this is pretty much the perfect amount to make me fold the range I assume he wants me to call with. That was an over-generalization and obviously a pretty poor assumption, but the thought process still works.

Would love to get more comments and discussion flowing since 6max isn't my main game and therefore the point of this series is going to be pointing out common flaws of HU thinking applied to 6max. The KT hand was one, although I don't think we have really hit the main points yet.
thisusedtoberoba59 Poker Newbie
11 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Re: Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

22 May 2012 at 6:16pm

Table 1 KQs 14:50 When we see regular x/f this kind of a board can we assume that his cbetting range in 3b pots is probable depolarized so we should take a note/adjust? Table 3 T9o 18:40 Would you x/r most of/all FDs on the flop? How that change for 100bb deep villain? What is the plan with let's say T9hh on that turn? Table 3 AKo 31:00 Don't you think we eliminate weak draws (SD, low FD) from our range w/ that betsize so we look more like strong draws with decent equity or good made hands (TPGK+)? Table 4. KTs If we are expecting to be played back often why don't we cbet smaller? (not believe that it's exploitable) Not sure can we expect such tight reg to x/r AJ or AT here (lol he actually had it)? Also his 3b is 2 so we can expect more AQ, maybe even QQ at his flatting range so bluffcatching looks worse?
thisusedtoberoba59 Poker Newbie
11 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Re: Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

22 May 2012 at 6:17pm

Not sure why there isn't new row when it looked well written when I clicked post :S
mischkoville Poker Newbie
48 Posts
- Add Chips
  Close
  
  You must be logged in →
Re: Ziddle's Hyper-LAG 6max

27 Nov 2012 at 8:35am

hmmmm don´t know what to think about