Samoleus 1k NL Part 4

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please sign in or Sign Up Now!

Dated:
Mar 17th, 2009
By:
Niman Kenkre
Game:
NLHE
Stake:
Mid Stakes
Teaching Method:
Session Video 3+ Table
Language:
English
Type:
6 Max
3273 Views
15 Comments
9.4510
(22 Ratings) 9.45

Niman continues discussion on his multi-part 1k NL session.

More From Niman Kenkre  Get RSS Feed For Niman Kenkre's Videos

Comments

  • NimanKenkre NimanKenkre Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    1191 Posts
    Samoleus 1k NL Part 4
    17 Mar 2009 at 10:35am
    Discussion for Samoleus 1k NL Part 4.
  • NimanKenkre NimanKenkre Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    1191 Posts
    Hi guys, just wanted to say that...
    17 Mar 2009 at 12:11pm
    Hi guys, just wanted to say that after the couple of posters that mentioned my habit of saying "you know", I've become much more cognizant of it. Unfortunately, this video and the next 4-5 by me had already been produced at the time that I was made aware of that. I hope those of you that are bothered by it can bear with it through the next few videos that are released.
  • thomastano thomastano Poker Newbie
    56 Posts
    You are a very good poker player...
    17 Mar 2009 at 1:02pm
    You are a very good poker player and instructor, but I reaaaaally would like you to explain your thaughts way shorter.
  • NimanKenkre NimanKenkre Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    1191 Posts
    thomasmastano, thanks for the compliments....
    17 Mar 2009 at 1:09pm
    thomasmastano, thanks for the compliments. unfortunately, I don't think that I will reduce the amount of detail in my explanations. after your suggestion of paring down the detail, I asked (in my blog) if that is what the rest of our members wanted. the overwhelming majority said that they want me to keep the amount of detail that I have in my videos. I'll shorten the explanations a bit for you and others in your camp, but the majority prefer my lengthier explanations. I hope you understand
  • thomastano thomastano Poker Newbie
    56 Posts
    Ok! I understand!

    I really like...
    17 Mar 2009 at 1:52pm
    Ok! I understand! I really like your style to play, I have myselfe been thinking of playing similar before watching your videos but sadly not taken the step to do it. One thing tho, when I was speculating in trying a playing style like this, my plan was to to play more aggressive and bluff more flops than what I have seen you do this far. Do you usally play more aggressive and bluff more post flop, and using your image that you call pre with premium pockets than what we have seen?
  • Beachking Beachking Poker Newbie
    17 Posts
    Honestly, don't worry too much...
    17 Mar 2009 at 1:59pm
    Honestly, don't worry too much about repeating things like "you know", everybody says something like that. If you can do videos without it - well done and great for us, but don't worry too much - the important thing is the poker theory you give us. About the amount of detail in your explanations I think the real question is what level you should put your thoughts on. Do you want to go through simple concepts in detail or should you assume we all know why you sometimes 3-bet garbage preflop?
  • Squizzel Squizzel Poker Newbie
    42 Posts
    i tend to minraise the button only...
    17 Mar 2009 at 5:45pm
    i tend to minraise the button only when you have the people who barely ever call but if there gonna play they will 3bet. theres a few of these bad players out there. and i minraise the button to give me a better pot to stack ratio when calling there 3bets. also i will 2.5x the button if i think people will fold as the same frequency as if you 3x. same with minraise, if u have a total nit i will minraise. i think both of these examples are fine justifications for minraising or 2.5xing the btn
  • Squizzel Squizzel Poker Newbie
    42 Posts
    against bad players i will almost...
    17 Mar 2009 at 5:48pm
    against bad players i will almost always 3x or 3.5x or 4x the BTN if i can get away with it. since there calling range is pretty much the same and i want to get in as much money as possible when i have positional advantage. against standard regs who arent too trigger happy with 3betting ill just std 3x. What do you think of all of this?
  • vinivici9586 vinivici9586 Poker Newbie
    28 Posts
    excellent video as usual. both...
    17 Mar 2009 at 6:22pm
    excellent video as usual. both your qq hands were very interesting. i particularly liked the first one because you did an excellent job of getting full value and disproved the 2p2 "omz you have QQ otb vs CO open, auto 3bet" mentality.
  • redCashion redCashion Poker Newbie
    7 Posts
    You play well and explain yourself...
    19 Mar 2009 at 3:31am
    You play well and explain yourself well, but your explanations can get pretty laborious and repetitive at times - as is the case again with the QQ hand and the AK hand at minute 32.
  • dispatch3d dispatch3d Poker Newbie
    19 Posts
    I was one of the you know complainers....
    19 Mar 2009 at 4:17pm
    I was one of the you know complainers. For whatever reason it didn't seem as pronounced in this video. Social ticks are pretty common especially if you don't present often. I'm sure I have them too (since I don't present often). Ac5 on QQ57Tcccc you bet all three streets. Why is it unlikely he bluffs if checked to on the river (ie. why is betting>>>checking)? You check a hand down with TT on Axxxss or something. I'd never do this. Just wondering exactly why betting turn is bad?
  • NimanKenkre NimanKenkre Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    1191 Posts
    with the Ac5x hand, he is likely...
    19 Mar 2009 at 5:03pm
    with the Ac5x hand, he is likely to have a real hand (ie a king or a pocket pair) and not a flush draw. a flush draw is less likely to continue on a paired board (and would often raise if he did decide to continue). when the flush gets there, he can't really raise much. and given that he does have a real hand, he is more likely to call a bet than try to turn it into a bluff on the river. with the TT, there is a very very small range of better hands (if any) that will fold to a turn bet and
  • NimanKenkre NimanKenkre Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    1191 Posts
    and an equally small range of worse...
    19 Mar 2009 at 5:04pm
    and an equally small range of worse hands that will call. therefore, checking down with TT (a hand that has plenty of showdown value (so should not bet) but is not strong enough to bet for value myself) is clearly the technically correct play. does that makes sense?
  • dispatch3d dispatch3d Poker Newbie
    19 Posts
    that makes sense (in the TT hand)....
    19 Mar 2009 at 6:05pm
    that makes sense (in the TT hand). Essentially you're saying you don't like to bet hands in the middle of your range/bottom of your value range since its very hard to get called by worse and would prefer to just bet bluffs instead. The only other one was a betsizing thing 9877r in 3bet pot, you hold QTs and bet 190 into 210 on the turn. Why so large? Are you just trying to discourage peels from Tx hands which beat you? (AT/KT) I really appreciate the effort you put into these videos.
  • dispatch3d dispatch3d Poker Newbie
    19 Posts
    and it'd be nice if we could write...
    19 Mar 2009 at 6:05pm
    and it'd be nice if we could write longer comments.

You must be logged in to post comments. Take a minute to sign up if you don't yet have an account.