This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please sign in or Sign Up Now!
8.7110
Niman concludes this series with part 4 reviewing TomJetland's play.
This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please sign in or Sign Up Now!
Niman concludes this series with part 4 reviewing TomJetland's play.
You must be logged in to post comments. Take a minute to sign up if you don't yet have an account.
1191 Posts
Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
78 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
1191 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
10 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
1191 Posts
Re: Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
Haha - yes he scored 67 goals in 7 games himself. The rest of the team scored about 20 cimbined. We had a total of just over scored against us on the season. He is a beast! :)
29 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
42 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
78 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
29 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
I really liked the format as it is.
It was good to see a player who naturaly got the balence right.. played well enough that most hands were being played well yet making enough mistakes that you had stuff to comment on.
I felt I learned more from you pointing out his mistakes than I usually do from watching videos where the the play is better because he was making the kind of mistakes that I make too.
Often mistakes are overlooked because there are spots that coaches either domt make the same kind of mistakes themselves or dont pick hands where therse common mistakes are made.
So Id like to see more of the same TBH.
78 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
I thought about the reason for me playing so many good draws so passively, and i came to the conclusion that it is the same reason for me calling with speculative hands preflop as you suggest, rather than 3bet/fold them as is common in high stakes games these days.
Namely, i want to call as much as i can profitably, and 3bet and check-raise more polarized, so that i can play more hands profitably in total. I understand that i sacrifice a bunch of fold equity when playing draws not as semibluffs but as "semifloats", but you do and advise the same with preflop calling hands, both ip and oop. I don't get the intrinsic difference.
The only connection i can see is to call many speculative hands preflop to play them aggressively postflop, which leads to a very bluffheavy raising and barreling range postflop.
This is a very important topic for me (in terms of poker) and i hope you get the time to answer to that thought.
Tom
78 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
3 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
(double post)
3 Posts
Re: Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
Please elaborate on this!
Congratulations on your play, nonetheless!
5 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
78 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)
The logical flaw in my question post, which thankfully was not answered by Niman (not being sarcastic), lies in the statement that i wanted to play as many hands as possible in a profitable way. This is not what making money in Poker is about. It is about building ranges for each play that lead to the most total-EV.
I am not even sure now if i just misworded it or if i thought that way, because my thinking about the game changed dramatically in the last couple of days.
I won't go into detail on those changes, hope you understand.
-Tom
21 Posts
Re: Niman's TomJetland Review (4)