This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please sign in or Sign Up Now!
10.0010
Dustin reviews two high-stakes 6max SNGs with focus on three and four handed play.
This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please sign in or Sign Up Now!
Dustin reviews two high-stakes 6max SNGs with focus on three and four handed play.
You must be logged in to post comments. Take a minute to sign up if you don't yet have an account.
92 Posts
DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
2 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
92 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
48 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
92 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
@ rextar- Good question. And stay tuned, I know I have a very similar hand in an upcoming video (also with AQo) where I recommend 3betting for value with the intention of folding to 4 bet, and go into more detail.
3 Betting with the intention to fold to a 4 bet does not inherently turn your hand into a bluff. The reason it works in this situation is because we have a player with a very specific range, or, rather, disparity between his {PFR/defend 3B range} and his {4B range}. We have a Laggy player that is opening over 25% pots, likely defending 3bets with nearly all of those hands and 4betting only a premium range at this stack depth (a 4bet range that AQ is insufficient to continue against). Essentially I am leaving money on the table by not getting more money in the pot preflop in position, against a ton of hands that I dominate, and I can then make a disciplined fold the small % he wakes up with a monster . It is also mandatory that I have AQ in this 3bet range, because it is important to have as many strong hands as possible in this range, besides premiums that are obviously going all the way. This way I can get the most out of him postflop.
Generally speaking, against this type of player, my 3B range should be LESS polarized, meaning I would rather 3B AJo/ATo/KQo rather than J8s/ A5s, for the former hands are much more likely to be dominating him instead of myself being dominated when I hold J8s/A5s. This is an important concept, and I feel many players have a generic 3B range against all players which is completely wrong. I explain this concept some in my Q&A videos. Thanks for the question.
48 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
3 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
92 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
5 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
@34:30~ with K5cc I think ICM overvalues our stack. and especially with future game situations accounted for (esp. if blinds are going up soon) i think this is a pretty good shove. I think you played it fine by getting it in.
@40:00~ with 65o, this is a fold and I don't think it is close at all. You're not paying attention to the ranges of SB vs BB when you fold.
Trying to go off of the ranges you were approx. giving them (and even being a bit more on the tight side)
With azntracker calling you {44+, A5s+, A8o+, KJs+, KQo}, and BB calling you {44+, A2s+, A8o+, KJs+, KQo}
If azntracker shoves 86% here (he's probably shoving this wide or wider) and BB calls 19% {33+, A2s+, A7o+, K8s+, KJo+, QJs} (overcall of JJ+)
Then shoving with 65o is -0.22. and TBH I think this is a very conservative set of ranges. I really think it's much worse...
@43:00~ again, 98s, you are doing ICM calcs with azntracker shoving 24% if you were to fold your btn in a spot where he's shoving closer to ATC.
I'm going to attribute this to you recovering from being sick - you made all the right plays in game at least so I'm assuming this was just a flub while recording the video which is understandable.
Looking forward to new vids from you and I'll be checking out the more recent ones in a bit.
92 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
@AzeGallo Thanks for pointing out these errors! It's very easy to auto pilot on SNGwiz and forget to correct the "If Hero folds" ranges, which are usually horribly wrong. I still think these spots are worth discussing and I don't think any of them are landslide decisions, but the first thing that should be done is adjusting that function. Obviously it has a pretty dramatic affect on results.
40:00 I think your ranges are pretty accurate so I agree with the -.22 number, hence it's a clear fold
43:00 Using calling ranges of 3.3% and 13% and a shoving range of 90% for AZN and 23% for secky produces a -0.2 edge, again a fold.
Again thanks for the corrections and I'll make sure to keep an eye out in future videos.
1 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play
92 Posts
Re: DDBeast's $1000 6max HH Review With Focus on 3 and 4 Handed Play