400nl Review

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please sign in or Sign Up Now!

Dated:
Dec 3rd, 2010
By:
Jason Senti
Game:
PLO
Stake:
Mid Stakes
Teaching Method:
Session Video 3+ Table
Language:
English
Type:
6 Max
3348 Views
13 Comments
8.3310
(6 Ratings) 8.33

Jason plays 2/4 online on FTP.

More From Jason Senti  Get RSS Feed For Jason Senti's Videos

Comments

  • JasonSenti JasonSenti Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    422 Posts
    400nl Review
    3 Dec 2010 at 8:25pm
    Discussion for 400nl Review.
  • Thebowskii Thebowskii Poker Prodigy
    324 Posts
    One question about the 87ss you...
    7 Dec 2010 at 2:27am
    One question about the 87ss you 3bet oop vs shesoheavy. You mentioned in the last CO open that that player was folding just over 50% to 3bets and 4betting 22%(?). When you are polarizing why but hands like 89ss into the air range, are you doing this because you are not able to play that hand oop profitably?
  • Thebowskii Thebowskii Poker Prodigy
    324 Posts
    Also in the first hand with A8ss...
    7 Dec 2010 at 2:30am
    Also in the first hand with A8ss where you double donk (versus c/c and put yourself in a check/guess spot often getting barreled off the better hand) + the spot with JTss in 3bet pot where you check to c/r but mention you sometimes lead BUT recommended bluff/semibluffs how else do you balance or is the fact that we're leading a flop that smashes our preflop range make it deceptive enough where balancing is only necessary versus players that know our tendencies outside a single session?
  • shackwovw shackwovw Poker Newbie
    18 Posts
    Can't wait for the next one!
    7 Dec 2010 at 3:12am
    Can't wait for the next one!
  • JasonSenti JasonSenti Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    422 Posts
    Thanks for the questions, Thebowskii....
    7 Dec 2010 at 11:14am
    Thanks for the questions, Thebowskii. The 87s hand, it is primarily because I am in the SB. Flatting isn't a great option, mostly cuz the BB will squeeze on occasion. If we were closing the action in the BB, I would be more likely to flat. Also, 30% of the time he will call, so we can't be completely polarized, so 3betting in the BB sometimes would be good, but I would flat it at least 50% of the time in a vacuum.
  • JasonSenti JasonSenti Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    422 Posts
    Re: leading. You mostly nailed...
    7 Dec 2010 at 11:26am
    Re: leading. You mostly nailed it on the head, Bowskii. Those flops hit our flatting range very well and in a single session, balance isn't all that important. If you are playing with opponents a lot, you will have to pay closer attn to your frequencies. With hands like KTcc, 78cc, etc, we won't always lead, we will c/r sometimes and c/f sometimes. Those were examples of hands to lead sometimes. Just pay attn to ur frequencies vs good players.
  • Thebowskii Thebowskii Poker Prodigy
    324 Posts
    Thank You for the clarification...
    7 Dec 2010 at 6:26pm
    Thank You for the clarification Jason. I find myself often balancing my lines on flop textures but I am really exited to try working a donk bet into my game as well as add more deception by mixing it up with equal strength holdings so that my play is less transparent. I realized after you mention it that I am rarely cognizant of the BB squeezing me unless he is very 3bet happy so I like hearing your standard thought process with hands that can be played in many ways was beneficial!
  • stinger5158 stinger5158 Poker Newbie
    6 Posts
    please stop talking about preflop...
    8 Dec 2010 at 5:41am
    please stop talking about preflop so much, it's 2/4. Also what are you doing on the river with 87hh on QQ663, you said you were trying to make him fold 44/55... you beat those hands?
  • JasonSenti JasonSenti Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    422 Posts
    Stinger5158, thanks for the feedback....
    8 Dec 2010 at 12:06pm
    Stinger5158, thanks for the feedback. I will try and get through preflop quicker in part 2. That is a valid point for the stakes. And wow, I will go back and watch the QQ6x6 hand. Sounds like an idiot moment from me (likely 2 idiot moments actually). TBH, that would drive me nuts watching someone else's vid, so thanks for pointing it out to me. Sometimes stuff like that will happen as we all make mistakes, but I will do my best to at least read the board correctly. :-P
  • eliduque eliduque Poker Newbie
    4 Posts
    Re: 400nl Review
    29 Dec 2010 at 2:46am
    Is check fold ever an option on the 10j four handed hand with a 10jq (2 diamond) flop? I feel like betting just gets you in a real ugly spot. Youre crushed by qj, q10, ak, 89, and jj and only have decent equity against kj, kq, aq, or any diamond draw that also includes a pair or straight draw. Against four opponents someone is really likely to have one of these, and although two of your opponents here were shorties, I feel you'd have to muck bottom two to any raise by any hand you are flipping with. Maybe I'm wrong and check/folding here is bad. Your thoughts Jason?
  • eliduque eliduque Poker Newbie
    4 Posts
    Re: 400nl Review
    29 Dec 2010 at 5:10am
    At minute 37 in the bottom right, you had j10 and decided to river value bet second pair jacks OOP. I definetely agree that you have the best hand here the vast majority of the time. My question is why bet? I feel like your opponents line here leans to a draw hand. But more importantly, what made hands that can call you do you give him? I feel like the only made hands that can call you are kj and aj, which he has a small percentage of the time and also have you beat. And if he does indeed have a draw (even more likely the case with a river fold from him), isn't checking the best way to get value?
  • bhtopspin bhtopspin Poker Newbie
    21 Posts
    Re: 400nl Review
    4 Jan 2011 at 9:04pm
    This video comes up when I filter for PLO games only.
  • AaronPope AaronPope Poker Trainee
    252 Posts
    Re: 400nl Review
    14 Feb 2011 at 9:31pm
    This shows up under PLO in search, and the game is labled as PLO.

You must be logged in to post comments. Take a minute to sign up if you don't yet have an account.