Alan Jackson 100nl (1) » Bluefire Poker Videos / Articles

  • Thebowskii Thebowskii Poker Prodigy
    324 Posts
    Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    2 Jan 2011 at 1:53pm

    Alan,

    In the hand where you double barreled AJo UTG+1 vs button flat on the flop Qs4hTs 7d 4d

    Would you have considered valuebetting Ax river or bluffing a blank king?  It just seems like versus any agressive player we are going to get pushed off our hand versus missed flushdraws and most Qx hands are going to fold on the river given our positions.  Doesn't that make it a profitable spot then to be the agressor on blank rivers?

  • Anonymous user Anonymous user Poker Newbie
    0 Posts
    Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    10 Jan 2011 at 9:20am
    When you speak of the cap game and quote" doing all the maths, figuring out my ranges, bet sizing" . This is a topic I`d like you to elaborate on, I am not asking you to reveal yours. Rather a how to tutorial on the general consept -R-
  • darnaudov darnaudov Poker Newbie
    1 Posts
    Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    26 Jan 2011 at 2:33pm
    Congrats for this video, it was very educational for me:]
  • arian319 arian319 Poker Newbie
    6 Posts
    Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    17 Feb 2011 at 9:18pm
    very good video thank you sir
  • Jonas123 Jonas123 Poker Newbie
    1 Posts
    Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    10 Jul 2012 at 10:49am
    Hi Alan First of all I really injoy your videos your a easy guy to connect to so thats helps me alot. I am actually writing for a friendly advice I am a NL100 6-table-shorthanded player who has decided to change site from ongame. playing efficiently 3 hours a day + 1-2 hours a day working on my game. And I would like your thoughts about the level on merge vs ipoker as these are the two netwotk I can get a good RB right now. Thanks for any help an I am sorry if this tread is the wrong place to interrupt. Kind regards Peter S
  • AJackson AJackson Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    417 Posts
    Re: Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    11 Jul 2012 at 1:41pm

    Jonas123 wrote:

    Hi Alan First of all I really injoy your videos your a easy guy to connect to so thats helps me alot. I am actually writing for a friendly advice I am a NL100 6-table-shorthanded player who has decided to change site from ongame. playing efficiently 3 hours a day + 1-2 hours a day working on my game. And I would like your thoughts about the level on merge vs ipoker as these are the two netwotk I can get a good RB right now. Thanks for any help an I am sorry if this tread is the wrong place to interrupt. Kind regards Peter S

    That's tough call.  Merge and iPoker are teh two sites I least like to back players.  Merge because they are open to US players which makes for a togh player field and iPoker bcuase high RB deals are so widely available.  Currently I would say iPoker is the better choice however from what I understand they are going to split into two sites and teh high rb sites will be lumped toether making it a togher site.

     

    You didn't ask but my opinion is that you'll overall do better playing on a lower rb site like OnGame or 888.  Less RB but higher win rate which makes for a much more enjoyable experience which allows you to grind more and and at the end of the month you'll make more money.

  • AJackson AJackson Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    417 Posts
    Re: Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    11 Jul 2012 at 1:41pm

    Jonas123 wrote:

    Hi Alan First of all I really injoy your videos your a easy guy to connect to so thats helps me alot. I am actually writing for a friendly advice I am a NL100 6-table-shorthanded player who has decided to change site from ongame. playing efficiently 3 hours a day + 1-2 hours a day working on my game. And I would like your thoughts about the level on merge vs ipoker as these are the two netwotk I can get a good RB right now. Thanks for any help an I am sorry if this tread is the wrong place to interrupt. Kind regards Peter S

    That's tough call.  Merge and iPoker are teh two sites I least like to back players.  Merge because they are open to US players which makes for a togh player field and iPoker bcuase high RB deals are so widely available.  Currently I would say iPoker is the better choice however from what I understand they are going to split into two sites and teh high rb sites will be lumped toether making it a togher site.

     

    You didn't ask but my opinion is that you'll overall do better playing on a lower rb site like OnGame or 888.  Less RB but higher win rate which makes for a much more enjoyable experience which allows you to grind more and and at the end of the month you'll make more money.

  • AJackson AJackson Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    417 Posts
    Re: Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    11 Jul 2012 at 1:43pm

    Jonas123 wrote:

    Hi Alan First of all I really injoy your videos your a easy guy to connect to so thats helps me alot. I am actually writing for a friendly advice I am a NL100 6-table-shorthanded player who has decided to change site from ongame. playing efficiently 3 hours a day + 1-2 hours a day working on my game. And I would like your thoughts about the level on merge vs ipoker as these are the two netwotk I can get a good RB right now. Thanks for any help an I am sorry if this tread is the wrong place to interrupt. Kind regards Peter S

    That's tough call.  Merge and iPoker are teh two sites I least like to back players.  Merge because they are open to US players which makes for a tougher player field and iPoker bcuase high RB deals are so widely available and makes for a tougher field.  Currently I would say iPoker is the better choice however from what I understand they are going to split into two sites and teh high rb sites will be lumped toether making it a togher site.  I think Merge software is much better than iPoker.

     

    You didn't ask but my opinion is that you'll overall do better playing on a lower rb site like OnGame or 888.  Less RB but higher win rate which makes for a much more enjoyable experience which allows you to grind more and and at the end of the month you'll make more money. 

  • AJackson AJackson Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    417 Posts
    Re: Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    11 Jul 2012 at 1:43pm

    Jonas123 wrote:

    Hi Alan First of all I really injoy your videos your a easy guy to connect to so thats helps me alot. I am actually writing for a friendly advice I am a NL100 6-table-shorthanded player who has decided to change site from ongame. playing efficiently 3 hours a day + 1-2 hours a day working on my game. And I would like your thoughts about the level on merge vs ipoker as these are the two netwotk I can get a good RB right now. Thanks for any help an I am sorry if this tread is the wrong place to interrupt. Kind regards Peter S

    That's tough call.  Merge and iPoker are teh two sites I least like to back players.  Merge because they are open to US players which makes for a tougher player field and iPoker bcuase high RB deals are so widely available and makes for a tougher field.  Currently I would say iPoker is the better choice however from what I understand they are going to split into two sites and teh high rb sites will be lumped toether making it a togher site.  I think Merge software is much better than iPoker.

     

    You didn't ask but my opinion is that you'll overall do better playing on a lower rb site like OnGame or 888.  Less RB but higher win rate which makes for a much more enjoyable experience which allows you to grind more and and at the end of the month you'll make more money. 

  • AJackson AJackson Bluefire Pro Poker Pro
    417 Posts
    Re: Re: Alan Jackson 100nl (1)
    11 Jul 2012 at 1:44pm

    Jonas123 wrote:

    Hi Alan First of all I really injoy your videos your a easy guy to connect to so thats helps me alot. I am actually writing for a friendly advice I am a NL100 6-table-shorthanded player who has decided to change site from ongame. playing efficiently 3 hours a day + 1-2 hours a day working on my game. And I would like your thoughts about the level on merge vs ipoker as these are the two netwotk I can get a good RB right now. Thanks for any help an I am sorry if this tread is the wrong place to interrupt. Kind regards Peter S

    That's tough call. Merge and iPoker are teh two sites I least like to back players. Merge because they are open to US players which makes for a tougher player field and iPoker bcuase high RB deals are so widely available and makes for a tougher field. Currently I would say iPoker is the better choice however from what I understand they are going to split into two sites and teh high rb sites will be lumped toether making it a togher site. I think Merge software is much better than iPoker. You didn't ask but my opinion is that you'll overall do better playing on a lower rb site like OnGame or 888. Less RB but higher win rate which makes for a much more enjoyable experience which allows you to grind more and and at the end of the month you'll make more money.